Sanskrit naming
What is this name actually made of?
Most Indian names are compounds, and the join is usually hidden. Ramesh is rama + isha — the a and the i merge into an e, so no amount of letter-matching will find it. This tool undoes that merge and shows you the pieces.
Examples:
How this works, and where it can be wrong
Sanskrit compounds fuse at the seam. Rama + isha becomes Ramesha because a + i becomes e; hita + ambara becomes Hitambara because two a sounds become one long one. That process is called sandhi, and reversing it is a real linguistic task rather than a spelling trick.
Established academic splitters exist — the INRIA Sanskrit Heritage segmenter and the University of Hyderabad splitter among them — but they need Sanskrit written with vowel length and retroflex marks intact. Everyday English spellings of Indian names have already lost that: written as hitambara, nothing on the page records whether that third vowel is long, so more than one split can be defensible.
So treat a result as an analysis, not a ruling. Where we can, we check each component against Monier-Williams' Sanskrit-English Dictionary (1899, public domain; digitisation by the Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon, CC BY-SA 4.0) and mark it in the dictionary. We show the dictionary only as evidence that a component is a real Sanskrit word — not as the meaning of the name, because a 19th-century scholarly gloss frequently means something different from what a family means today.
Components that are themselves names we document link straight through, so you can follow a name down to its parts and back out again. Browse names · Our research and data